Newsletter
Be notified of site updates, subscribe to the newsletter.
|
Comments
If you are going to create sex objects, at least do it right. The proportioning of the breasts are wrong, the curvature doesn't match the size. Too perky.
Yeaaaah!! Horny!!! naah, its actually two amazing pieces of art... i mean, if i was to do stuff like that, it would look more like a mutated bird or sumthing.. really cool!!
She has a very beautiful stance and graceful appeal. Kind of like the "tomboy princess". I do wish i could see a closer looker at her face and the expression being shown. Clothing and armour match her very well, gives her a feel of power and beauty, due to how thin the armour is shown. She also has that sexy, dirty blond hair, bombshell look. Like all of the other comments, she very sexy. Just in case I was refering to the "Musketeer".
I am a normal heterosexual man and I admit that I do like looking at breasts when possible.
Having said that, I must agree with Philip Carter in that it seems a little inappropriate in this case for the breasts to be 'on show'
i'm really impressed by your work but i think the topless look is a little too much. Attention is drawn towards the breasts instead of on the overall curves of their body and awesome gear.
great job, she is angelic, breasts and all.
The renderings are wonderful, but these pieces were first posted four years ago. Is there any point to allowing further "critiques"? As one looks back on them, they are not only very repetitive, but surely Byung-Hee Choe has gone on to do so many things that a critique of these particular renderings no longer has much meaning.
|
|